No wonder there is so little information about AUKUS. Keep the populace in the dark (on grounds of 'national security') - because the less they know the better! And the more they know, the more they will appreciate what a corrupted debacle AUKUS is.
Thank you Ben. Good to know you clicked through to the speeches. Re your comment: simple reason - big deadline looming and no time to spare being sick.
There are a wide range of responses to the reality of infectious diseases, and denial seems to be your choice.
You imply that all reasonable people share your deluded denial, which is not the case.
We do share the reality of state capture and corruption, with democracy morphing into technofeudalism, and I too thank Michelle for this "tip of the iceberg" article.
All reasonable people who require logical details or biologic proof do indeed come to the same conclusion I have. Believe what you like, I am just surprised someone with Michelle's critical interest didn't arrive there already.
No wonder there is so little information about AUKUS. Keep the populace in the dark (on grounds of 'national security') - because the less they know the better! And the more they know, the more they will appreciate what a corrupted debacle AUKUS is.
Excellent work. Keep it up
What a great article and speech. Thank you Michelle. I can't imagine though why you sat on stage with a mask.
Thank you Ben. Good to know you clicked through to the speeches. Re your comment: simple reason - big deadline looming and no time to spare being sick.
Michelle, an honest question.. how can you write the articles you do and still believe in dangerous respiratory viruses?
huh ?
There are a wide range of responses to the reality of infectious diseases, and denial seems to be your choice.
You imply that all reasonable people share your deluded denial, which is not the case.
We do share the reality of state capture and corruption, with democracy morphing into technofeudalism, and I too thank Michelle for this "tip of the iceberg" article.
All reasonable people who require logical details or biologic proof do indeed come to the same conclusion I have. Believe what you like, I am just surprised someone with Michelle's critical interest didn't arrive there already.